DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2014-002
General, PERSMAN 12-B- 18, JKK, Misconduct, RE4
Honorable
RELIEF GRANTED Under Honorable Conditions
BY DRB
ADMIN None
CORRECTIONS
TIS 3 yrs, 3 months, 21days
| Policy Implications None
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The applicant was discharged for Misconduct due to Involvement with Drugs in 2006. The applicant’s
complete Personnel Data Record and Separation Package were available for the Board to review
During a unit urinalysis in early 2006, the applicant tested positive for cocaine use as documented on an
administrative remarks entry. The applicant disputed the findings of the drug testing sample by saying that the
chain of custody was done incorrectly and that the specimen could have been altered or tampered with. The
applicant’s NJP appeal was sent to the regional Approving Authority who concurred that it was a drug incident.
Pursuant to policy, the applicant was recommended for Discharge due to a drug incident. The Board finds no
issues with propriety or equity in this case.
The applicant was notified of the intent to discharge, and the applicant was advised of the rights to an attorney.
The applicant made a statement and objected to the discharge.
Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than an Under Honorable Conditions character of service for
individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.
The Board notes that the applicant received a General Discharge. Per post policy noted in ALCOAST 562/08, a
General discharge is no longer considered an official character of service. Therefore, the board recommends a
partial upgrade to an Under Honorable Conditions character of service.
Propriety: Discharge was proper.
Equity: Discharge was equitable.
Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: Partial relief is granted to the
applicant’s Character of Service to Under Honorable Conditions based on post-policy issued by way of
ALCOAST 562/08.
CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 031
The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy. The General, Under Honorable Conditions discharge is equitable.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 059
The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Therefore, based on the post-separation policy, the Board recommends that the character of service be amended to Under Honorable Conditions. In accordance with ALCOAST 562/08, the character of service be amended to Under Honorable Conditions based on the post- separation policy.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 041
The applicant had a positive urinalysis result for methamphetamines in the late summer of 2005. The Board notes a General Discharge was issued. Therefore, the board recommends a partial upgrade to an Under Honorable Conditions character of service.
CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 047
The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The Board endorses an administrative change to amend the Character of Service to Under Honorable Conditions based on the issuance of ALCOAST 562/08. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General Discharge, with an Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.
CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 001
Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy. Therefore, the Board recommends the use of SPD code JKM to accurately categorize this as an act of misconduct not otherwise listed by the JKK SPD code. Additionally, the Board notes that the DD-214 issued ‘General’ for the Character of Service.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 075
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-075 General, COMDTINST 1000.6A 12-B-18, JKK, Misconduct, RE4 Honorable Admin correction based on post-policy from ALCOAST 562/08 Under Honorable Conditions TIS 2 yrs, 8 months, 25 days Policy Implications _| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Misconduct due to Involvement with Drugs. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result...
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 038
The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Therefore, based on the post-separation policy, the Board recommends that the character of service be amended to Under Honorable Conditions. Yet, in accordance with ALCOAST 562/08, the Board does recommend that the character of service be amended to Under Honorable Conditions based on the post-separation policy.
CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 076
The Board finds no issues with propriety in this case. The Board finds no issues of equity in this case. Therefore, the applicant should be issued a DD-215 reflecting this administrative change.
CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 073
EQUITY: The Board finds no issues with equity in this case. The applicant’s character of service is consistent with policy and appropriate for personnel processed for use of illegal drugs. The appropriate character of service is “Under Honorable Conditions,” therefore the Board recommends an administrative change to the applicant’s record to reflect “Under Honorable Conditions” per ALCOAST 562/08.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 027
The Majority board recommends partial relief on the applicant’s Character of Service, based on the post-policy issued in ALCOAST 562/08. And, ALCOAST 254/05 on May 12, 2005 stated the following: “The Coast Guard may resume Anthrax vaccinations for personnel assigned to designated commands but only under the condition that personnel scheduled to receive the Anthrax vaccination may ACCEPT or REFUSE the vaccination. Board Conclusion: The Majority Board (3-2) recommends no relief to the...